Best managed MySQL platform for web applications

Combined ranking

1. 1
   Amazon RDS for MySQLamazon.com ↗▲313 pts

   GPT #1Claude —Gemini #3Grok #1

   Best all-round default: genuine MySQL, mature backups and point-in-time recovery, Multi-AZ failover, read replicas, broad regional coverage, strong monitoring, and excellent AWS integration without unusual compatibility constraints.

   + model takes & fixes− hide details

   GPT Best all-round default: genuine MySQL, mature backups and point-in-time recovery, Multi-AZ failover, read replicas, broad regional coverage, strong monitoring, and excellent AWS integration without unusual compatibility constraints.

   Grok Mature, battle-tested reliability with excellent high availability (Multi-AZ), automated backups/patching/sc

   Gemini The standard for traditional managed MySQL without serverless complexity or custom storage layers. Delivers 100% engine compatibility, proven operational reliability, vast hardware configuration options, and straightforward cloud migration.

   Where it falls short

   per GPT AWS pricing and configuration complexity can become substantial, and it is a poor fit for teams seeking cloud portability.

   per Gemini Monolithic instance architecture requires maintenance windows or failover downtime for vertical scaling, lacking decoupled storage benefits.

2. 2
   PlanetScaleplanetscale.com ↗▼113 pts

   GPT #3Claude #1Gemini #1Grok —

   The strongest MySQL-native developer experience available — Vitess-backed horizontal sharding, non-blocking schema changes with deploy requests and revert, database branching, and query insights; the Metal tier (local NVMe) delivers price-performance that beats hyperscaler network-storage offerings for high-QPS workloads. Assumes a web-app team that values workflow and scale headroom over the lowest possible entry price.

   + model takes & fixes− hide details

   Claude The strongest MySQL-native developer experience available — Vitess-backed horizontal sharding, non-blocking schema changes with deploy requests and revert, database branching, and query insights; the Metal tier (local NVMe) delivers price-performance that beats hyperscaler network-storage offerings for high-QPS workloads. Assumes a web-app team that values workflow and scale headroom over the lowest possible entry price.

   Gemini Leads for modern web development due to Git-like database branching, zero-downtime schema migrations, and high-throughput serverless scaling powered by Vitess. Assumes developer velocity and deployment safety are top priorities. Near-tie with Amazon Aurora MySQL depending on legacy database design requirements.

   GPT Exceptional developer workflow and horizontal-scaling story, with nonblocking schema changes, branching, strong connection handling, built-in redundancy, and access to the team behind Vitess; particularly compelling for fast-growing SaaS applications.

   Where it falls short

   per GPT Vitess is MySQL-compatible rather than unrestricted MySQL, so unsupported features and operational differences can complicate migrations or applications expecting full native behavior.

   per Claude No free tier and premium pricing at the low end; some MySQL features (foreign key constraints historically, certain plugins) are constrained by the Vitess layer — not for teams needing vanilla MySQL edge features or a bargain starter database.

   per Gemini Native foreign key constraints are not supported by default and Vitess architectural quirks make it unsuitable for legacy ORM schemas heavily reliant on relational database-level enforcement.

3. 3
   Amazon Aurora MySQLamazon.com ↗▼110 pts

   GPT #4Claude #2Gemini #2Grok —

   Best-in-class durability architecture (six-way replicated distributed storage), fast failover, up to 15 low-lag read replicas, Serverless v2 scale-to-load, and deep AWS ecosystem integration (IAM, RDS Proxy, Global Database for multi-region). The default safe choice for production web apps already on AWS.

   + model takes & fixes− hide details

   Claude Best-in-class durability architecture (six-way replicated distributed storage), fast failover, up to 15 low-lag read replicas, Serverless v2 scale-to-load, and deep AWS ecosystem integration (IAM, RDS Proxy, Global Database for multi-region). The default safe choice for production web apps already on AWS.

   Gemini The benchmark for enterprise-scale web applications needing standard MySQL compatibility with cloud-native performance. Features decoupled compute/storage, 128TB storage auto-expansion, fast read replicas, and Aurora Serverless v2. Assumes primary deployment on AWS.

   GPT The strongest choice here for demanding AWS-native workloads, offering fast failover, distributed durable storage, many read replicas, global deployment options, and elastic serverless capacity; nearly ties PlanetScale when scalability outweighs simplicity.

   Where it falls short

   per GPT Aurora-specific architecture, variable costs, and imperfect MySQL feature compatibility create meaningful lock-in and make it excessive for ordinary small applications.

   per Claude Cost is opaque and can balloon (I/O or I/O-Optimized pricing, per-ACU serverless charges), and it lags upstream MySQL versions; lock-in is real since Aurora's storage engine isn't portable — not for cost-sensitive teams or multi-cloud strategies.

   per Gemini Deep AWS vendor lock-in and a complex, costly pricing model that makes it over-engineered and expensive for small-to-medium web projects.

4. 4
   Google Cloud SQL for MySQLstore.google.com ↗▼19 pts

   GPT #2Claude #3Gemini #4Grok —

   Near-tied with RDS for conventional web applications; straightforward operations, solid high availability, automated backups, read replicas, private networking, and especially good integration with Cloud Run, GKE, and Google’s observability stack.

   + model takes & fixes− hide details

   GPT Near-tied with RDS for conventional web applications; straightforward operations, solid high availability, automated backups, read replicas, private networking, and especially good integration with Cloud Run, GKE, and Google’s observability stack.

   Claude Cleanest hyperscaler managed-MySQL experience for the typical practitioner — Enterprise Plus tier adds near-zero-downtime maintenance, data cache, and 35-day PITR; straightforward pricing, solid HA, and tight integration with GKE/Cloud Run. Ranked above Azure on maintenance ergonomics and read-pool simplicity; it's a near-tie with Azure Flexible Server.

   Gemini Premier choice for Google Cloud-hosted web applications, offering automated maintenance windows, seamless GCP IAM integration, multi-zone high availability, and strong observability.

   Where it falls short

   per GPT Scaling remains more instance-oriented than truly elastic, while premium configurations can be expensive.

   per Claude Vertical scaling only — no built-in sharding or Aurora-style storage scale-out, so very large or write-heavy apps eventually outgrow it; GCP-only.

   per Gemini Compute performance and storage throughput ceilings lag behind Aurora, alongside strict lock-in to the GCP ecosystem.

5. 5
   AAiven for MySQL▲12 pts

   GPT —Claude #5Gemini #5Grok —

   True multi-cloud (runs in AWS/GCP/Azure/DO regions), transparent all-inclusive pricing, easy cross-cloud migration and Terraform-first operations, plus a real free tier; strong fit for teams avoiding hyperscaler lock-in or spanning clouds.

   + model takes & fixes− hide details

   Claude True multi-cloud (runs in AWS/GCP/Azure/DO regions), transparent all-inclusive pricing, easy cross-cloud migration and Terraform-first operations, plus a real free tier; strong fit for teams avoiding hyperscaler lock-in or spanning clouds.

   Gemini Best solution for multi-cloud portability, offering fully managed open-source MySQL across AWS, GCP, and Azure with automated ops, enterprise compliance features, and zero cloud vendor lock-in.

   Where it falls short

   per Claude A thinner MySQL feature set and smaller ecosystem than the hyperscalers (no serverless, modest extension/config surface), and you pay a management premium over raw VMs — not for single-cloud teams who'd get deeper integration natively.

   per Gemini Higher minimum entry cost compared to entry-level cloud-native DBs and lacks modern serverless scale-to-zero compute capabilities.

6. 6
   AAzure Database for MySQL▼12 pts

   GPT —Claude #4Gemini —Grok —

   Genuine community MySQL (not a fork) with zone-redundant HA, burstable tiers that make dev/small-prod cheap, stop/start billing, and a business-critical tier on faster storage; the obvious pick for Azure-centric shops. Near-tie with Cloud SQL — rank assumes no existing cloud commitment.

   + model takes & fixes− hide details

   Claude Genuine community MySQL (not a fork) with zone-redundant HA, burstable tiers that make dev/small-prod cheap, stop/start billing, and a business-critical tier on faster storage; the obvious pick for Azure-centric shops. Near-tie with Cloud SQL — rank assumes no existing cloud commitment.

   Where it falls short

   per Claude Fewer advanced capabilities than Aurora or PlanetScale (no serverless autoscaling compute, weaker read-scale story), and historically slower version adoption — not for teams needing elastic scale or the newest MySQL quickly.

7. 7
   DDigitalOcean Managed MySQL—1 pts

   GPT #5Claude —Gemini —Grok —

   Excellent value for small and midsize web applications that prioritize transparent pricing, a simple control plane, automated backups, standby nodes, and read-only replicas over hyperscaler breadth.

   + model takes & fixes− hide details

   GPT Excellent value for small and midsize web applications that prioritize transparent pricing, a simple control plane, automated backups, standby nodes, and read-only replicas over hyperscaler breadth.

   Where it falls short

   per GPT It lacks the geographic reach, scaling sophistication, integrations, and enterprise controls of the leading hyperscaler services.

Rank history

Just missed the top 5

By model

Common questions

Tracked by ModelsAgree · rank 1 = 5 pts … rank 5 = 1 pt · re-polled weekly