ModelsAgree
← All leaderboards
🗣

Best open-source speech-to-text model

4 models · updated 2026-07-15

The verdict

OpenAI Whisper leads — 2 of 4 models rank OpenAI Whisper the top pick.

Not unanimous: ChatGPT picks Qwen3-ASR; Grok picks NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B.

As of 2026-07-15, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok collectively rank OpenAI Whisper first for open-source speech-to-text model on modelsagree.com.

Your vendor missing? Check any brand →

Combined ranking

  1. 1
    GPT #3Claude #1Gemini #1Grok #3

    Still the default choice for the typical practitioner in 2026 — ~99-language coverage, strong robustness to accents and noisy real-world audio, permissive MIT license, and an unmatched ecosystem (faster-whisper, whisper.cpp, WhisperX for diarization/alignment, endless fine-tunes) that means it runs everywhere from a phone to a server; ranked on total practical value, not raw leaderboard WER, where newer models beat it.

    + model takes & fixes

    Claude Still the default choice for the typical practitioner in 2026 — ~99-language coverage, strong robustness to accents and noisy real-world audio, permissive MIT license, and an unmatched ecosystem (faster-whisper, whisper.cpp, WhisperX for diarization/alignment, endless fine-tunes) that means it runs everywhere from a phone to a server; ranked on total practical value, not raw leaderboard WER, where newer models beat it.

    Gemini Unmatched multilingual coverage across 99+ languages and a dominant open-source ecosystem of optimized runtimes (like whisper.cpp and faster-whisper) that make it the industry standard for general-purpose deployment.

    GPT The safest general-purpose choice thanks to robust multilingual recognition, translation, mature tooling, broad hardware support, permissive licensing, and an excellent speed-quality trade-off

    Grok Proven multilingual powerhouse (99+ languages) with strong real-world robustness to accents, noise, and long-form audio; massive ecosystem, easy fine-tuning, and forks (e.g., faster-whisper) make it accessible and valuable for typical diverse-language practitioners despite not always topping pure English leaderboards.

    Where it falls short

    per GPT It trails newer specialists on raw accuracy and can hallucinate text during silence or difficult audio

    per Claude Slow and compute-hungry at full size with no native streaming, and it notoriously hallucinates text on silence or music — long-form production use requires VAD chunking and an optimized runtime rather than the vanilla repo.

    per Gemini High computational latency and susceptibility to hallucination loops or repetition during periods of background noise or silence.

    per Grok Slower inference on standard hardware without heavy optimization; can struggle with very domain-specific jargon or highest English precision vs. newer hybrids.

  2. 2
    GPT #2Claude #2Gemini Grok #4

    Near-tie for practical first place; exceptionally fast, accurate transcription with punctuation, capitalization, timestamps, long-audio support, modest hardware needs, and 25 European languages

    + model takes & fixes

    GPT Near-tie for practical first place; exceptionally fast, accurate transcription with punctuation, capitalization, timestamps, long-audio support, modest hardware needs, and 25 European languages

    Claude The speed-accuracy king — near-top of the Hugging Face Open ASR Leaderboard while transcribing hours of audio in seconds (RTF orders of magnitude better than Whisper large), CC-BY licensed, with accurate word-level timestamps and punctuation; v3 extended it to ~25 European languages, making it the best pick for high-volume English/European transcription pipelines.

    Grok Outstanding speed/throughput (high RTFx) and low-latency streaming suitability while maintaining competitive accuracy; ideal for real-time or batched production use cases common to practitioners; strong NVIDIA ecosystem integration.

    Where it falls short

    per GPT Its language coverage is largely European, making it unsuitable for many Asian, African, and Middle Eastern deployments

    per Claude Language coverage is still a fraction of Whisper's, and it lives in the NVIDIA NeMo ecosystem — smoothest on NVIDIA GPUs, with less community tooling for exotic deployment targets.

    per Grok Trades some peak accuracy for speed; less strong on broad multilingual support than Whisper.

  3. 3
    GPT #5Claude #4Gemini Grok #1

    Tops or near-tops Hugging Face Open ASR Leaderboard with ~5.63% avg WER on English benchmarks via strong Conformer + Qwen LLM decoder hybrid (SALM architecture); excellent accuracy for typical practitioner use in clean-to-moderate noisy English audio; strong community/HF support and NVIDIA tooling for deployment.

    + model takes & fixes

    Grok Tops or near-tops Hugging Face Open ASR Leaderboard with ~5.63% avg WER on English benchmarks via strong Conformer + Qwen LLM decoder hybrid (SALM architecture); excellent accuracy for typical practitioner use in clean-to-moderate noisy English audio; strong community/HF support and NVIDIA tooling for deployment.

    Claude Took the top WER spot on the Open ASR Leaderboard at release with a hybrid ASR+LLM design that also enables post-transcription tasks (summarization, Q&A), CC-BY licensed and commercially usable — near-tie with Parakeet, which wins above it only on throughput per dollar for bulk transcription.

    GPT Exceptional English accuracy, punctuation, capitalization, hallucination robustness, and optional transcript summarization or question answering

    Where it falls short

    per GPT It is English-only, relatively large, NeMo-dependent, and optimized around audio segments no longer than roughly 40 seconds

    per Claude English-only, which disqualifies it for the many practitioners who need multilingual support (its multilingual Canary 1B sibling covers fewer languages at lower accuracy).

    per Grok Higher latency/compute needs than lighter CTC/TDT models; not ideal for real-time streaming or very low-resource/edge devices without optimization.

  4. 4
    GPT Claude Gemini #2Grok #2

    Top-tier accuracy on open benchmarks under an Apache 2.0 license, offering a non-autoregressive variant for massive throughput and a Plus model that natively supports speaker attribution and timestamps.

    + model takes & fixes

    Gemini Top-tier accuracy on open benchmarks under an Apache 2.0 license, offering a non-autoregressive variant for massive throughput and a Plus model that natively supports speaker attribution and timestamps.

    Grok Very close to top accuracy (~5.85% WER), excels in enterprise English ASR plus built-in translation capabilities; robust for production with good handling of varied domains; open weights suit self-hosting practitioners needing reliability over raw speed.

    Where it falls short

    per Gemini Very limited multilingual support, optimized primarily for English and five other major languages.

    per Grok Larger size leads to higher inference costs/latency; less optimized for extreme multilingual or ultra-low-latency scenarios compared to specialists.

  5. 5
    Qwen3-ASR5 pts
    GPT #1Claude Gemini Grok

    Best overall accuracy-capability balance; strong multilingual and noisy-audio recognition across 30 languages and 22 Chinese dialects, plus long-form, streaming, language detection, songs, vLLM serving, and Apache-2.0 weights

    + model takes & fixes

    GPT Best overall accuracy-capability balance; strong multilingual and noisy-audio recognition across 30 languages and 22 Chinese dialects, plus long-form, streaming, language detection, songs, vLLM serving, and Apache-2.0 weights

    Where it falls short

    per GPT Timestamps require a separate 0.6B forced-aligner, increasing memory and deployment complexity

  6. 6
    GPT Claude #3Gemini Grok #5

    Apache-2.0 speech-LLM (3B Mini and 24B) that pairs Whisper-class-or-better multilingual transcription with genuine audio understanding — Q&A, summarization, and function-calling straight from speech — so one open model covers both transcription and downstream comprehension; assumed the practitioner values this consolidation, which is what lifts it over pure-ASR rivals.

    + model takes & fixes

    Claude Apache-2.0 speech-LLM (3B Mini and 24B) that pairs Whisper-class-or-better multilingual transcription with genuine audio understanding — Q&A, summarization, and function-calling straight from speech — so one open model covers both transcription and downstream comprehension; assumed the practitioner values this consolidation, which is what lifts it over pure-ASR rivals.

    Grok Competitive high accuracy among open weights (top-tier WER in evaluations); efficient balance of performance and deployability for multilingual or general use; newer architectures offer strong value for practitioners seeking alternatives to NVIDIA/IBM dominance.

    Where it falls short

    per Claude Heavier than dedicated ASR models for plain transcription — if you only need text out, a 24B (or even 3B) LLM-based stack is overkill in VRAM and cost versus Parakeet.

    per Grok Emerging ecosystem with potentially fewer mature deployment tools/forks than established options like Whisper; variable real-world testing depth.

  7. 7
    NVIDIA Canary3 pts
    GPT Claude Gemini #3Grok

    Delivers state-of-the-art accuracy for English and 25 European languages using FastConformer architecture, often outperforming Whisper on word error rate (WER) and speech translation.

    + model takes & fixes

    Gemini Delivers state-of-the-art accuracy for English and 25 European languages using FastConformer architecture, often outperforming Whisper on word error rate (WER) and speech translation.

    Where it falls short

    per Gemini Deeply tied to NVIDIA's heavy NeMo framework, making CPU-only or lightweight edge deployment highly impractical.

  8. 8
    GPT Claude Gemini #4Grok

    Exceptionally fast non-autoregressive model (up to 15x faster than Whisper-large) that natively provides language identification, speech emotion recognition, and audio event detection.

    + model takes & fixes

    Gemini Exceptionally fast non-autoregressive model (up to 15x faster than Whisper-large) that natively provides language identification, speech emotion recognition, and audio event detection.

    Where it falls short

    per Gemini Highly localized language support, performing well only for Mandarin, Cantonese, English, Japanese, and Korean.

  9. 9
    GPT #4Claude Gemini Grok

    Strong multilingual accuracy across 14 languages, Apache-2.0 licensing, and straightforward Transformers integration earn it a close place behind Whisper

    + model takes & fixes

    GPT Strong multilingual accuracy across 14 languages, Apache-2.0 licensing, and straightforward Transformers integration earn it a close place behind Whisper

    Where it falls short

    per GPT Gated model access and a younger, less battle-tested ecosystem reduce its practical value

  10. 10
    GPT Claude #5Gemini Grok

    The best open option for real-time streaming — purpose-built for low-latency (~0.5-2.5s delay) transcription with semantic VAD and word timestamps, CC-BY-4.0, scaling to hundreds of concurrent streams per GPU; fills the production niche (voice agents, live captions) that batch-oriented Whisper-style models handle poorly.

    + model takes & fixes

    Claude The best open option for real-time streaming — purpose-built for low-latency (~0.5-2.5s delay) transcription with semantic VAD and word timestamps, CC-BY-4.0, scaling to hundreds of concurrent streams per GPU; fills the production niche (voice agents, live captions) that batch-oriented Whisper-style models handle poorly.

    Where it falls short

    per Claude Covers only English and French at launch-model quality, so it's a specialist tool for live voice products, not a general transcription workhorse.

  11. 11
    Moonshine1 pts
    GPT Claude Gemini #5Grok

    Designed specifically for low-latency edge deployment by using a dynamic input window that scales compute with audio length rather than forcing a fixed 30-second padding.

    + model takes & fixes

    Gemini Designed specifically for low-latency edge deployment by using a dynamic input window that scales compute with audio length rather than forcing a fixed 30-second padding.

    Where it falls short

    per Gemini Restricted strictly to English and lacks the vocabulary depth needed for complex multi-speaker or noisy environments.

Just missed the top 5

GPT NVIDIA Canaryexcellent multilingual ASR and translation, but less compelling overall than Qwen3-ASR and Parakeet · OpenAI Whisper large-v3slightly stronger than Turbo in some conditions, but usually not enough to justify its much higher inference cost

Claude Distil-Whisper / faster-whisperhuge practical value but they're distillations/runtimes of Whisper rather than independent models — their merit is largely credited to the Whisper entry

Gemini Meta SeamlessM4T v2Missed because its translation-centric, massive architecture is overkill and computationally inefficient for simple speech-to-text tasks · Qwen2-AudioMissed because its large-scale LLM backbone is too resource-heavy for dedicated ASR compared to dedicated transcription models

Grok Cohere Transcribestrong leaderboard contender but narrower language focus/less general practitioner accessibility

By model

ChatGPT

  1. 1.Qwen3-ASR
  2. 2.NVIDIA Parakeet TDT
  3. 3.OpenAI Whisper
  4. 4.Cohere Transcribe
  5. 5.NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B

Claude

  1. 1.OpenAI Whisper
  2. 2.NVIDIA Parakeet TDT
  3. 3.Voxtral
  4. 4.NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B
  5. 5.Kyutai STT

Gemini

  1. 1.OpenAI Whisper
  2. 2.IBM Granite Speech
  3. 3.NVIDIA Canary
  4. 4.Alibaba SenseVoice
  5. 5.Moonshine

Grok

  1. 1.NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B
  2. 2.IBM Granite Speech
  3. 3.OpenAI Whisper
  4. 4.NVIDIA Parakeet TDT
  5. 5.Voxtral

Common questions

What is the best open-source speech-to-text model according to AI models?

OpenAI Whisper leads. 2 of 4 models rank OpenAI Whisper the top pick. The current top 3: OpenAI Whisper, NVIDIA Parakeet TDT, NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B. Ranked by asking ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok the same buying question and merging their top-5 picks, updated 2026-07-15. Source: modelsagree.com.

Which open-source speech-to-text model did each AI model pick first?

ChatGPT: Qwen3-ASR. Claude: OpenAI Whisper. Gemini: OpenAI Whisper. Grok: NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B.

Do the AI models agree on the best open-source speech-to-text model?

Not unanimous. ChatGPT picks Qwen3-ASR; Grok picks NVIDIA Canary-Qwen 2.5B.

How is this open-source speech-to-text model ranking made?

ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok are each asked the same buying question in a fresh session with no system steering. Their top-5 answers are merged (rank 1 = 5 pts … rank 5 = 1 pt) into the consensus ranking, re-polled weekly and tracked over time.

More on how polling works: full methodology →

This ranking moves

We re-poll all four models weekly. Get one short email when a #1 flips.

Cite this ranking

ModelsAgree, “Best open-source speech-to-text model” — merged ranking from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok, polled 2026-07-15. https://modelsagree.com/best/best-open-source-speech-to-text-model (CC BY 4.0)

Tracked by ModelsAgree · rank 1 = 5 pts … rank 5 = 1 pt · re-polled weekly