ModelsAgree
← All leaderboards

Actix-web

What ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok actually say · July 2026

The verdict

Actix-web appears in 2 AI-ranked categories — best position #2 for rust frameworks for high-performance apis.

#2🧩 Best Rust frameworks for high-performance APIs2/4 models · updated 2026-07-16
GPT Claude Gemini #2Grok #1

Consistently tops or near-tops real-world and TechEmpower-style benchmarks for raw throughput (often ~850K req/sec) and low p99 latency (~2ms) in high-load scenarios; mature actor model excels for stateful/high-concurrency workloads like real-time or CPU-bound services; battle-tested in production with strong WebSocket/multipart support.

Gemini The undisputed performance champion for raw throughput and low latency under heavy, concurrent traffic. Built on a custom actor-based runtime architecture, it avoids some of the overhead of tower's generic abstractions, yielding a 10-15% throughput advantage and flatter latency curves in saturation tests. It is in a near-tie with Axum; Actix-web loses the top spot only because its proprietary stack reduces ecosystem compatibility and developer productivity.

Where Actix-web falls short, per the models

  • Gemini It uses a custom ecosystem rather than the standardized Tower/Tokio stack, making it harder to share middleware or libraries from the broader Rust ecosystem, and its API is historically more opinionated and less modular.

Top alternatives per the models: Axum · Actix Web · Salvo · Poem

#3🧩 Best Rust frameworks for high-performance APIs2/4 models · updated 2026-07-16
GPT #2Claude #2Gemini Grok

Near-tied with axum and often the better choice when maximum HTTP throughput, low overhead, mature features, and fine-grained server control dominate the decision.

Claude The longest-proven high-performance Rust web framework — consistently at or near the top of TechEmpower rounds, mature middleware, extensive real production deployments, strong actor-adjacent patterns for stateful workloads, and a stable API that has outlived several hype cycles. Near-tie with Axum for raw throughput; it ranks second mainly on ecosystem momentum, not capability.

Where Actix-web falls short, per the models

  • GPT Its framework-specific service and middleware abstractions have a steeper learning curve and integrate less naturally with the Tower ecosystem.
  • Claude Runs its own runtime arrangement (actix-rt atop Tokio) with some non-Send handler assumptions, so it integrates less seamlessly with the broader Tokio/Tower ecosystem, and community/maintainer bus-factor has historically been thinner than Tokio's.

Top alternatives per the models: Axum · Actix-web · Salvo · Poem

Head-to-head — how the models call it

Embed your ranking badge

Actix-web ranks #2 for best rust frameworks for high-performance apis by AI-model consensus. Put the badge in your README, docs or site — it updates automatically as the models re-rank.

Actix-web — ranked #2 for Best Rust frameworks for high-performance APIs by AI models on ModelsAgree
Markdown (README)
[![Actix-web — ranked #2 for Best Rust frameworks for high-performance APIs by AI models on ModelsAgree](https://modelsagree.com/badge/actix-web.svg)](https://modelsagree.com/best/best-rust-frameworks-for-high-performance-apis?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-actix-web)
HTML
<a href="https://modelsagree.com/best/best-rust-frameworks-for-high-performance-apis?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-actix-web"><img src="https://modelsagree.com/badge/actix-web.svg" alt="Actix-web — ranked #2 for Best Rust frameworks for high-performance APIs by AI models on ModelsAgree" height="28"></a>

Rankings are computed from what the models answer, re-polled weekly · raw reasoning shown verbatim · methodology