ModelsAgree
← All leaderboards

Ape

What ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok actually say · July 2026

The verdict

Ape appears in 1 AI-ranked category — best position #4 for smart contract development framework.

Positioning brief — for the Ape team

Why the models put Ape at #4 for smart contract development framework

  • Python-native framework Claude · Gemini · GPTThe best Python-native framework
  • Native contract testing Claude · Gemini · GPTnative Python contract testing
  • Modular multi-chain plugins Claude · GPTmultiple EVM chains through a modular plugin architecture
  • Built for quantitative teams Claude · Geminibuilt specifically for data scientists, quantitative finance teams, and MEV researchers

What the models credit Foundry (#1) with — and don’t credit Ape

  • Fast Rust toolchain GPT · Claude · Gemini · Grokfast Rust toolchain
  • Best-in-class security testing GPT · Claude · Gemini · Grokbest-in-class fuzzing and invariant testing
  • Strong ecosystem and adoption Claude · Grokmost serious protocols and auditors work in it, so ecosystem examples, cheatcodes, and hiring all point here

What would move the rank — the models’ fix lines, unified

  • Grow plugin ecosystem GPT · Claude · Geminia smaller developer plugin ecosystem than Node/TypeScript frameworks
  • Improve integrations and examples GPT · Claudefewer integrations and examples than Foundry or Hardhat
  • Improve execution speeds GeminiSlower execution speeds than Rust-native tools

Restructured from verbatim model output · nothing invented · every quote machine-verified

#4🛠 Best smart contract development framework3/4 models · updated 2026-07-19
GPT #5Claude #4Gemini #4Grok

The best Python-native framework — pytest-based testing, multi-chain plugin architecture, and first-class support for Vyper as well as Solidity; the natural choice for DeFi quant/data teams and Vyper shops where Python is the house language.

Gemini Modular Python-based framework (successor to Brownie) built specifically for data scientists, quantitative finance teams, and MEV researchers who require native Python contract testing, analytics, and transaction scripting. Assumes Python stack integration is required.

GPT A clean Python framework spanning compilation, testing, deployment, account management, contract interaction, and multiple EVM chains through a modular plugin architecture.

Where Ape falls short, per the models

  • GPT Plugin quality and coverage vary, and its smaller practitioner ecosystem provides fewer integrations and examples than Foundry or Hardhat.
  • Claude Much smaller community and plugin surface than Foundry/Hardhat, so you hit undocumented edges sooner and hiring for it is harder.
  • Gemini Slower execution speeds than Rust-native tools and a smaller developer plugin ecosystem than Node/TypeScript frameworks.

Top alternatives per the models: Foundry · Hardhat · Anchor · Wake

Watch Ape

Boards re-poll weekly and the models change their minds. One short email only when Ape's standing moves — a rank change, a rival overtaking, or new reasoning from the models. Nothing otherwise.

Embed your ranking badge

Ape ranks #4 for best smart contract development framework by AI-model consensus. Put the badge in your README, docs or site — it updates automatically as the models re-rank.

Ape — ranked #4 for Best smart contract development framework by AI models on ModelsAgree
Markdown (README)
[![Ape — ranked #4 for Best smart contract development framework by AI models on ModelsAgree](https://modelsagree.com/badge/ape.svg)](https://modelsagree.com/best/best-smart-contract-development-framework?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-ape)
HTML
<a href="https://modelsagree.com/best/best-smart-contract-development-framework?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-ape"><img src="https://modelsagree.com/badge/ape.svg" alt="Ape — ranked #4 for Best smart contract development framework by AI models on ModelsAgree" height="28"></a>

Rankings are computed from what the models answer, re-polled weekly · raw reasoning shown verbatim · methodology