ModelsAgree
← All leaderboards

Decodo

What ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok actually say · September 2026

Visit decodo.com ↗

The verdict

Decodo appears in 5 AI-ranked categories — best position #1 for residential proxy network for large-scale web scraping.

Positioning brief — for the Decodo team

Why the models put Decodo at #1 for residential proxy network for large-scale web scraping

  • best price-to-performance ratio GPT · Gemini · Claude“best price-to-performance ratio”
  • excellent success rates GPT · Grok · Gemini“excellent success rates”
  • low latency GPT · Grok · Gemini“low latency”
  • strong city-level targeting GPT · Grok · Gemini · Claude“strong city-level targeting”

What would move the rank — the models’ fix lines, unified

  • hardest-target unblocking trail premium services Claude“Pool depth and hardest-target unblocking trail Bright Data/Oxylabs”
  • less extensive enterprise customization GPT“enterprise customization are less extensive than Bright Data’s”
  • lacks advanced scraping and automation tools Gemini“Lacks the extensive suite of advanced scraping APIs, built-in browser automation tools, and large-scale managed data extraction features”

Restructured from verbatim model output · nothing invented · every quote machine-verified

GPT #1Claude #3Gemini #2Grok #1

Near-tied with Oxylabs on reliability, but its excellent success rates, low latency, broad geo-targeting, easy tooling, and more approachable volume pricing make it the strongest overall value for production scraping

Grok Highest success rates (~99.8% in 2026 tests on tough targets like Cloudflare/Instagram), fastest residential response times (~0.6s avg), massive clean 125M+ IP pool with strong city-level targeting and ethical filtering that minimizes blocks for large-scale scraping; proven heavy lifter for high-volume ops with reliable infrastructure post-rebrand.

Gemini Formerly Smartproxy and awarded Best All-Rounder in 2026, it offers the best price-to-performance ratio for typical practitioners, matching premium-tier success rates (99.92% vs Oxylabs' 99.93% in a near-tie) and response times (0.53 s) at a fraction of the cost. It includes developer-friendly API integration, free helper tools, and granular targeting without extra fees.

Claude Best overall value for the typical mid-scale practitioner — large, clean pool, transparent pay-per-GB pricing, low friction onboarding, solid rotation and country/city targeting, and good docs/APIs; hits ~90% of what the top two do at a materially lower cost.

Where Decodo falls short, per the models

  • GPT Its controls, compliance support, and enterprise customization are less extensive than Bright Data’s
  • Claude Pool depth and hardest-target unblocking trail Bright Data/Oxylabs, so the most aggressively defended sites at extreme scale can still edge past it.
  • Gemini Lacks the extensive suite of advanced scraping APIs, built-in browser automation tools, and large-scale managed data extraction features of premium services.
  • Grok Higher entry pricing (~$6/GB PAYG, scales better at volume) — not ideal for tiny or very sporadic low-budget users.

Poll history — On this board 2 of 2 polls since Jul 18 · now #1

#2 → #1

Top alternatives per the models: Oxylabs · Bright Data · SOAX · IPRoyal

Claude #3Gemini #3Grok #2

Near-tied with Oxylabs on success rates (99.92%) and US pool depth in 2026 tests, with cleaner dashboard, broader self-service rotation controls, and materially better effective $/successful-GB at mid-to-high volumes; assumes value-conscious large-scale operator who still needs reliable hard-target performance

Claude The value-for-scale sweet spot — strong pool quality and success rates at meaningfully lower per-GB cost than the top two, clean dashboard/API, and genuinely self-serve onboarding; the pragmatic default for the typical mid-scale practitioner who doesn't need the last few points of unblock rate.

Gemini Delivers the best overall value for the typical practitioner, providing fast response times across a 55M+ IP pool and clean self-serve access without requiring minimum monthly financial commitments.

Where Decodo falls short, per the models

  • Claude Smaller network and thinner enterprise features (SLAs, custom compliance, edge-case targeting) than #1/#2, so the very hardest targets and very largest jobs can outgrow it.
  • Gemini Lacks built-in automated JavaScript rendering or advanced anti-bot bypass features at the base proxy level, requiring custom solver integration for aggressive anti-scraping targets.
  • Grok Slightly smaller verified unique IP surface than Oxylabs under sustained load, so pure petabyte ops may exhaust diversity faster

Poll history — On this board 2 of 2 polls since Aug 3 · now #2

#3 → #2

Top alternatives per the models: Bright Data · Oxylabs · SOAX · IPRoyal

Claude #4Gemini #4Grok #1

Top-tier independent success rates (99.75% infrastructure) and response times (~0.74s) on real mobile pools of 10M+ 4G/5G IPs across 160+ locations with city/ASN/carrier targeting and sticky sessions to 24h; explicitly strong for app/localization QA with ethical sourcing and developer-friendly controls that deliver reliable geo simulation without enterprise bloat. Assumption: typical practitioner prioritizes consistent interactive testing sessions over pure scale.

Claude Best value-to-usability ratio — clean dashboard, fast setup, solid mobile coverage in major markets, and pricing that suits smaller teams doing routine locale checks.

Gemini Excellent cost-to-performance balance featuring user-friendly dashboard setup, flexible pay-as-you-go pricing, and reliable mobile IP coverage across major global app markets for mid-market dev teams.

Where Decodo falls short, per the models

  • Claude Mobile pool and carrier-level granularity are shallower than the leaders; long-tail markets and precise ASN targeting are weak spots.
  • Gemini Smaller overall pool depth and limited carrier-level selection in tier-2 and tier-3 geographic regions compared to Bright Data or Oxylabs.
  • Grok Not for ultra-high-volume continuous scraping where per-GB costs rise relative to pure budget options or where absolute deepest carrier naming is mandatory.

Poll history — On this board 2 of 2 polls since Aug 3 · now #1

#4 → #1

Top alternatives per the models: Oxylabs · Bright Data · SOAX · Byteful

Claude #3Gemini #3

Best value-to-reliability balance for the typical practitioner — large residential pool, solid success rates on retail targets, transparent pay-as-you-go pricing, and a genuinely easy self-serve setup; strong choice when you need scale without enterprise commitment.

Gemini Highest value-to-performance ratio in the industry, combining enterprise-level 55M+ pool reliability with self-serve, contract-free tiered pricing; fast response times and dependable uptime make it the best practical choice for scrapers processing large catalog volumes without massive commitments.

Where Decodo falls short, per the models

  • Claude Unblocking depth and targeting granularity trail Bright Data/Oxylabs, so the very hardest anti-bot ecommerce sites (aggressive Akamai/DataDome) will need more retries or an add-on solution.
  • Gemini Lacks hyper-granular ZIP-code and carrier-level targeting, making it a poor fit for localized store-level inventory scraping where precise physical location dictates data accuracy.

Top alternatives per the models: Bright Data · Oxylabs · Webshare · Zyte

Claude —Gemini —Grok #5

Modular Web/eCommerce Scraper API with dedicated Amazon pricing templates, free tier, and pay-only-for-complexity pricing (standard vs premium+JS) delivers solid success and structured output at the lowest entry cost among reliable options; practical for volume price tracking without enterprise contracts

Where Decodo falls short, per the models

  • Grok Smaller network and less mature structured depth than Bright Data/Oxylabs on the most defended sites

Poll history — On this board 1 of 2 polls since Aug 12 · now #5

– → #5

Top alternatives per the models: Bright Data · Zyte · Oxylabs · Apify

Head-to-head — how the models call it

Watch Decodo

Boards re-poll weekly and the models change their minds. One short email only when Decodo's standing moves — a rank change, a rival overtaking, or new reasoning from the models. Nothing otherwise.

Embed your ranking badge

Decodo ranks #1 for best residential proxy network for large-scale web scraping by AI-model consensus. Put the badge in your README, docs or site — it updates automatically as the models re-rank.

Decodo — ranked #1 for Best Residential Proxy Network for Large-Scale Web Scraping by AI models on ModelsAgree
Markdown (README)
[![Decodo — ranked #1 for Best Residential Proxy Network for Large-Scale Web Scraping by AI models on ModelsAgree](https://modelsagree.com/badge/decodo.svg)](https://modelsagree.com/best/best-residential-proxy-network-for-large-scale-web-scraping?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-decodo)
HTML
<a href="https://modelsagree.com/best/best-residential-proxy-network-for-large-scale-web-scraping?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-decodo"><img src="https://modelsagree.com/badge/decodo.svg" alt="Decodo — ranked #1 for Best Residential Proxy Network for Large-Scale Web Scraping by AI models on ModelsAgree" height="28"></a>

Rankings are computed from what the models answer, re-polled on demand · raw reasoning shown verbatim · methodology