ModelsAgree
← All leaderboards

Giskard

What ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok actually say · September 2026

Visit giskard.ai ↗

The verdict

Giskard appears in 1 AI-ranked category — best position #5 for ai red teaming and llm security testing tool.

Positioning brief — for the Giskard team

Why the models put Giskard at #5 for ai red teaming and llm security testing tool

  • Approachable automated vulnerability scanning GPT · Claude“Excellent automated scans for agents and RAG systems”
  • Hallucination and business-risk testing GPT · Claude“strong hallucination and business-risk testing”
  • Clean actionable reports GPT · Claude“actionable reports”
  • RAG-specific evaluation GPT · Claude“RAG-specific evaluation (RAGET)”

What the models credit Promptfoo (#1) with — and don’t credit Giskard

  • CI/CD automation and integration GPT · Gemini · Claude · Grok“excellent CI/CD integration”
  • Configurable multi-turn strategies GPT“configurable multi-turn strategies”
  • Continuous regression testing Claude · Grok“continuous regression testing with a large plugin set”

What would move the rank — the models’ fix lines, unified

  • Deeper adaptive multi-step exploitation GPT · Claude“Deepen adaptive multi-step exploitation of tool-using agents”
  • Serious offensive depth Claude“more a safety-and-quality scanner than a serious offensive tool”

Restructured from verbatim model output · nothing invented · every quote machine-verified

GPT #3Claude #5Gemini —Grok —

Excellent automated scans for agents and RAG systems, strong hallucination and business-risk testing, actionable reports, and an approachable SDK-plus-dashboard workflow

Claude The most approachable open-source vulnerability scanner for QA/ML teams — a Python scan() detects hallucination, prompt injection, harmful content, and robustness/bias issues with clean reports, plus RAG-specific evaluation (RAGET), bridging quality assurance and security for teams without a dedicated red teamer. Near-tie for this slot with DeepTeam (see MISSED), which is more purely offensive but younger.

Where Giskard falls short, per the models

  • GPT Deepen adaptive multi-step exploitation of tool-using agents
  • Claude Its adversarial/offensive depth is shallower than garak or PyRIT — more a safety-and-quality scanner than a serious offensive tool, so it won't satisfy dedicated red teamers.

Poll history — On this board 2 of 2 polls since Jul 12 · now #7

#6 → #7

Top alternatives per the models: Promptfoo · garak · PyRIT · Mindgard

Watch Giskard

Boards re-poll weekly and the models change their minds. One short email only when Giskard's standing moves — a rank change, a rival overtaking, or new reasoning from the models. Nothing otherwise.

Embed your ranking badge

Giskard ranks #5 for best ai red teaming and llm security testing tool by AI-model consensus. Put the badge in your README, docs or site — it updates automatically as the models re-rank.

Giskard — ranked #5 for Best AI red teaming and LLM security testing tool by AI models on ModelsAgree
Markdown (README)
[![Giskard — ranked #5 for Best AI red teaming and LLM security testing tool by AI models on ModelsAgree](https://modelsagree.com/badge/giskard.svg)](https://modelsagree.com/best/best-ai-red-teaming-tool?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-giskard)
HTML
<a href="https://modelsagree.com/best/best-ai-red-teaming-tool?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-giskard"><img src="https://modelsagree.com/badge/giskard.svg" alt="Giskard — ranked #5 for Best AI red teaming and LLM security testing tool by AI models on ModelsAgree" height="28"></a>

Rankings are computed from what the models answer, re-polled on demand · raw reasoning shown verbatim · methodology