ModelsAgree
← All leaderboards

Granola

What ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok actually say · September 2026

Visit granola.ai ↗

The verdict

Granola appears in 1 AI-ranked category — best position #1 for ai meeting notetaker.

#1📝 Best AI meeting notetaker4/4 models · updated 2026-08-15
GPT #1Claude #1Gemini #1Grok #3

Best overall note quality and workflow for typical professionals: bot-free capture, excellent synthesis that incorporates your own notes, strong cross-meeting chat, templates, and a polished interface at a reasonable price

Claude Notepad-style capture that augments your own typed notes rather than sending a bot into the call; records via system audio so it works across Zoom, Meet, Teams, and in-person alike; consistently the cleanest, most usable summaries for founders, consultants, and PMs who live in back-to-back meetings; low-friction and privacy-friendly since nothing visibly joins.

Gemini Seamless bot-free desktop audio capture that uniquely augments the user's own live notes with LLM context, producing concise, human-styled meeting records rather than overwhelming transcript summaries; ranked top for individual practitioner utility.

Grok True bot-free device capture that enhances the user's own live notes into structured output without altering meeting dynamics or retaining audio; polished Mac/Windows experience prioritizes privacy and engagement for typical knowledge workers

Where Granola falls short, per the models

  • GPT Not for teams that require video recordings, a visible consent bot, or deep conversation-intelligence analytics
  • Claude Mac-desktop-centric and built around a single note-taker's workflow — weak fit for teams that need an auto-joining bot to record meetings the user doesn't attend, or for heavy multilingual transcription.
  • Gemini Requires a desktop client and manual note triggering, making it unsuitable for organizations needing centralized, automated server-side recording or phone dial-in capture.
  • Grok Requires active note-taking input and limited free history, so it is not for fully hands-off automation or heavy sharing/replay workflows

Poll history — On this board 7 of 7 polls since Jul 11 · #1 the last 4

#1 → #1 → #2 → #1 → #1 → #1 → #1

What changed in the models’ minds

GPTJul 15 → Jul 16 poll

  • Newvideo recordings“require video recordings”
  • Newvisible consent bot“a visible consent bot”
  • Newdeep conversation-intelligence analytics
  • Droppednear-tied with Fathom

+2 more changes

Top alternatives per the models: Fathom · Fireflies.ai · Otter.ai · Krisp

Head-to-head — how the models call it

Watch Granola

Boards re-poll weekly and the models change their minds. One short email only when Granola's standing moves — a rank change, a rival overtaking, or new reasoning from the models. Nothing otherwise.

Embed your ranking badge

Granola ranks #1 for best ai meeting notetaker by AI-model consensus. Put the badge in your README, docs or site — it updates automatically as the models re-rank.

Granola — ranked #1 for Best AI meeting notetaker by AI models on ModelsAgree
Markdown (README)
[![Granola — ranked #1 for Best AI meeting notetaker by AI models on ModelsAgree](https://modelsagree.com/badge/granola.svg)](https://modelsagree.com/best/best-ai-meeting-notetaker?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-granola)
HTML
<a href="https://modelsagree.com/best/best-ai-meeting-notetaker?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-granola"><img src="https://modelsagree.com/badge/granola.svg" alt="Granola — ranked #1 for Best AI meeting notetaker by AI models on ModelsAgree" height="28"></a>

Rankings are computed from what the models answer, re-polled on demand · raw reasoning shown verbatim · methodology