Greenbone OpenVAS
What ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok actually say · August 2026
Visit greenbone.net ↗The verdict
Greenbone OpenVAS appears in 1 AI-ranked category — best position #5 for vulnerability scanner for infrastructure.
Positioning brief — for the Greenbone OpenVAS team
Why the models put Greenbone OpenVAS at #5 for vulnerability scanner for infrastructure
- strongest open-source option Grok · GPT · Claude“The strongest open-source option”
- self-hosted for air-gapped environments Grok · GPT · Claude“self-hosted for air-gapped and sovereignty-sensitive environments”
- solid CVE coverage Grok · Claude“solid CVE coverage”
- no per-asset licensing costs Grok · GPT · Claude“no per-asset licensing costs”
What the models credit Qualys VMDR (#1) with — and don’t credit Greenbone OpenVAS
- continuous asset discovery GPT · Gemini · Grok“Exceptional continuous asset discovery”
- TruRisk prioritization GPT · Claude · Gemini“TruRisk prioritization”
- integrated patch workflows GPT · Claude · Gemini“integrated patch workflows”
What would move the rank — the models’ fix lines, unified
- detection-feed gap GPT · Claude · Grok“Close the detection-feed gap”
- cut scan times GPT · Claude · Grok“cut scan times, which lag commercial rivals significantly”
- more ongoing maintenance, tuning, and expertise Grok“Requires more ongoing maintenance, tuning, and expertise than commercial tools”
Restructured from verbatim model output · nothing invented · every quote machine-verified
Leading open-source option with strong Nessus heritage, comprehensive NVT feed for infrastructure vulnerabilities, customizable authenticated scans, solid web interface and community support making it highly effective and cost-free for on-prem/hybrid infra practitioners who invest in setup.
GPT Capable infrastructure scanning, strong standards-based reporting, transparent OpenVAS foundations, and compelling value for organizations wanting control or self-hosting
Claude The strongest open-source option — solid CVE coverage, no per-asset licensing costs, self-hosted for air-gapped and sovereignty-sensitive environments, and a commercial appliance tier for support
Where Greenbone OpenVAS falls short, per the models
- GPT Improve detection consistency, feed speed, and workflow polish to match the leading commercial platforms
- Claude Close the detection-feed gap (slower and thinner than Nessus's plugin feed) and cut scan times, which lag commercial rivals significantly
- Grok Requires more ongoing maintenance, tuning, and expertise than commercial tools; feed updates and performance can lag behind paid solutions in very large or dynamic environments.
Poll history — On this board 3 of 6 polls since Jul 9 · now #2
– → – → – → #5 → #5 → #2
Top alternatives per the models: Qualys VMDR · Tenable Vulnerability Management · Wiz · Rapid7 InsightVM
Watch Greenbone OpenVAS
Boards re-poll weekly and the models change their minds. One short email only when Greenbone OpenVAS's standing moves — a rank change, a rival overtaking, or new reasoning from the models. Nothing otherwise.
Embed your ranking badge
Greenbone OpenVAS ranks #5 for best vulnerability scanner for infrastructure by AI-model consensus. Put the badge in your README, docs or site — it updates automatically as the models re-rank.
[](https://modelsagree.com/best/best-vulnerability-scanner-for-infrastructure?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-greenbone-openvas)<a href="https://modelsagree.com/best/best-vulnerability-scanner-for-infrastructure?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-greenbone-openvas"><img src="https://modelsagree.com/badge/greenbone-openvas.svg" alt="Greenbone OpenVAS — ranked #5 for Best vulnerability scanner for infrastructure by AI models on ModelsAgree" height="28"></a>Rankings are computed from what the models answer, re-polled on demand · raw reasoning shown verbatim · methodology