ModelsAgree
← All leaderboards

Sliver

What ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok actually say · August 2026

Visit sliver.sh

The verdict

Sliver appears in 1 AI-ranked category — best position #2 for penetration testing tool for red teams.

Positioning brief — for the Sliver team

Why the models put Sliver at #2 for penetration testing tool for red teams

  • Leading open-source, cross-platform C2 Gemini · Grok · ClaudeThe leading open-source, cross-platform C2
  • Strong evasion and implant flexibility Gemini · Grok · Claudestrong evasion, implant flexibility
  • Free and actively maintained Grok · Claudefree, actively maintained
  • Multiple egress protocols Gemini · Claudenative support for multiple egress protocols

What the models credit Cobalt Strike (#1) with — and don’t credit Sliver

  • Massive ecosystem of BOFs and community tooling Claude · Geminia massive ecosystem of BOFs and community tooling
  • Battle-tested stability Grokbattle-tested stability
  • Reporting GPTreporting

What would move the rank — the models’ fix lines, unified

  • Feature-complete graphical user interface Claude · Geminifeature-complete graphical user interface
  • Richer post-exploitation modules Claudericher post-exploitation modules
  • Steeper learning curve GrokSteeper learning curve for advanced custom agents

Restructured from verbatim model output · nothing invented · every quote machine-verified

#2💥 Best penetration testing tool for red teams3/4 models · updated 2026-07-14
GPT Claude #5Gemini #2Grok #2

Outstanding open-source Go-based command-and-control platform featuring native support for multiple egress protocols and built-in advanced evasion capabilities.

Grok Open-source cross-platform C2 with strong evasion, implant flexibility, and active Bishop Fox maintenance; excels in rapid deployment and modern adversary emulation for typical red team ops without licensing fees.

Claude The leading open-source, cross-platform C2 — free, actively maintained, with mTLS/DNS/HTTP(S) transports, per-binary obfuscation, and multiplayer support, it's become the go-to Cobalt Strike alternative for teams that can't or won't license commercial C2.

Where Sliver falls short, per the models

  • Claude Maturity and polish still trail Cobalt Strike — richer post-exploitation modules and a more stable operator UI would make it a true peer rather than the budget choice.
  • Gemini Needs a fully integrated, feature-complete graphical user interface to match commercial alternatives.
  • Grok Steeper learning curve for advanced custom agents compared to more polished commercial options (not ideal for absolute beginners).

Poll history — On this board 5 of 6 polls since Jun 29 · now #2

#5#5#4#5#2

Top alternatives per the models: Cobalt Strike · Metasploit Framework · Burp Suite Professional · BloodHound

Head-to-head — how the models call it

Watch Sliver

Boards re-poll weekly and the models change their minds. One short email only when Sliver's standing moves — a rank change, a rival overtaking, or new reasoning from the models. Nothing otherwise.

Embed your ranking badge

Sliver ranks #2 for best penetration testing tool for red teams by AI-model consensus. Put the badge in your README, docs or site — it updates automatically as the models re-rank.

Sliver — ranked #2 for Best penetration testing tool for red teams by AI models on ModelsAgree
Markdown (README)
[![Sliver — ranked #2 for Best penetration testing tool for red teams by AI models on ModelsAgree](https://modelsagree.com/badge/sliver.svg)](https://modelsagree.com/best/best-penetration-testing-tool-for-red-teams?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-sliver)
HTML
<a href="https://modelsagree.com/best/best-penetration-testing-tool-for-red-teams?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-sliver"><img src="https://modelsagree.com/badge/sliver.svg" alt="Sliver — ranked #2 for Best penetration testing tool for red teams by AI models on ModelsAgree" height="28"></a>

Rankings are computed from what the models answer, re-polled on demand · raw reasoning shown verbatim · methodology