Spearbit
What ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok actually say · July 2026
The verdict
Spearbit appears in 1 AI-ranked category — best position #3 for smart contract audit firm.
Positioning brief — for the Spearbit team
Why the models put Spearbit at #3 for smart contract audit firm
- curated elite independent researchers GPT · Claude · Gemini“curates elite independent security researchers into dedicated audit squads”
- specialists matched to protocol type GPT · Claude“matched to the exact protocol type”
- top-tier manual review quality GPT · Claude · Gemini“delivering top-tier manual review quality without junior auditor dilution”
What the models credit Trail of Bits (#1) with — and don’t credit Spearbit
- formal methods and fuzzing GPT“exceptional cryptography, formal methods, fuzzing, protocol-design review”
- open-source tooling GPT · Claude · Gemini“open-source tooling such as Slither, Echidna, and Medusa”
- consistently rigorous public reports Claude“consistently rigorous public reports with findings other firms miss”
What would move the rank — the models’ fix lines, unified
- quality depends on researchers assigned GPT · Claude“Quality and availability depend partly on the particular researchers assigned”
- scheduling depends on researcher availability GPT · Gemini“Scheduling depends heavily on specific researcher availability”
- premium process is costly GPT“the premium process is costly”
Restructured from verbatim model output · nothing invented · every quote machine-verified
Near-tie for first; its curated researcher network and lead-reviewer model assemble unusually strong specialists for complex DeFi, L1/L2, bridge, and ZK work, with excellent researcher-to-project matching.
Claude Marketplace model assembles bespoke teams of top independent researchers (many ex-top-5-firm leads and elite contest performers) matched to the exact protocol type, so you get specialist depth (e.g., perp DEX or restaking expertise) a generalist firm can't guarantee; Cantina adds competitive-review coverage on top of the private engagement.
Gemini Decentralized network that curates elite independent security researchers into dedicated audit squads, delivering top-tier manual review quality without junior auditor dilution.
Where Spearbit falls short, per the models
- GPT Quality and availability depend partly on the particular researchers assigned, and the premium process is costly.
- Claude Quality varies with which researchers you land — it's a curation layer, not a single accountable bench, so outcomes depend on team composition and a strong internal point of contact to manage the engagement.
- Gemini Scheduling depends heavily on specific researcher availability, requiring protocol teams to plan timelines well in advance.
Top alternatives per the models: Trail of Bits · OpenZeppelin · Sherlock · Zellic
Head-to-head — how the models call it
Watch Spearbit
Boards re-poll weekly and the models change their minds. One short email only when Spearbit's standing moves — a rank change, a rival overtaking, or new reasoning from the models. Nothing otherwise.
Embed your ranking badge
Spearbit ranks #3 for best smart contract audit firm by AI-model consensus. Put the badge in your README, docs or site — it updates automatically as the models re-rank.
[](https://modelsagree.com/best/best-smart-contract-audit-firm?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-spearbit)<a href="https://modelsagree.com/best/best-smart-contract-audit-firm?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-spearbit"><img src="https://modelsagree.com/badge/spearbit.svg" alt="Spearbit — ranked #3 for Best smart contract audit firm by AI models on ModelsAgree" height="28"></a>Rankings are computed from what the models answer, re-polled weekly · raw reasoning shown verbatim · methodology