ModelsAgree
← All leaderboards

Invicti

What ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok actually say · August 2026 · incumbent

Visit invicti.com

The verdict

Invicti appears in 4 AI-ranked categories — best position #2 for dast tool for dynamic app testing.

Positioning brief — for the Invicti team

Why the models put Invicti at #2 for dast tool for dynamic app testing

  • proof-based exploit validation GPT · Gemini · Claude · Grokproof-based exploit validation
  • low-noise accurate results GPT · Gemini · Claude · Grokdrastically reducing false positives for enterprise triage
  • enterprise-scale automation GPT · Claude · Grokenterprise-scale automation
  • strong compliance reporting Claude · Groksolid compliance reporting

What the models credit Burp Suite (#1) with — and don’t credit Invicti

  • unmatched manual testing depth Claude · Gemini · Grokunmatched manual testing depth
  • huge extension ecosystem Claude · Gemini · Grok · GPThuge extension ecosystem (BApp Store)
  • sophisticated crawling and authentication Grok · GPTsophisticated crawling and authentication

What would move the rank — the models’ fix lines, unified

  • transparent flexible pricing GPT · Claude · Gemini · GrokPublish transparent pricing and simplify licensing
  • lighten the enterprise sales motion Claude · Gemini · Groklighten the enterprise sales motion so mid-size teams can adopt it without a procurement cycle
  • more flexible developer-centric workflows Gemini · Grokless flexible for developer-centric workflows or rapid iteration

Restructured from verbatim model output · nothing invented · every quote machine-verified

#2🕷 Best DAST tool for dynamic app testing4/4 models · updated 2026-07-14
GPT #1Claude #3Gemini #2Grok #3

Best overall combination of deep web and API scanning, multilayer shadow-API discovery, proof-based exploit validation, low-noise results, and enterprise-scale automation

Gemini Features industry-leading proof-based scanning technology that automatically exploits discovered vulnerabilities to confirm them, drastically reducing false positives for enterprise triage.

Claude Proof-based scanning that safely auto-verifies exploitability slashes false positives, strong automation and scale for large application portfolios, good IAST-assisted coverage, solid compliance reporting

Grok Proof-based scanning delivers exceptional accuracy (near-zero false positives) and confirmed exploits, scalable enterprise automation with strong reporting; excels for teams prioritizing reliable, audit-ready results over manual effort.

Where Invicti falls short, per the models

  • GPT Publish transparent pricing and simplify licensing
  • Claude Modernize pricing and lighten the enterprise sales motion so mid-size teams can adopt it without a procurement cycle
  • Gemini Offering more flexible, transparent developer-centric pricing tiers instead of targeting only high-end enterprise buyers.
  • Grok Higher cost and less flexible for developer-centric workflows or rapid iteration in high-velocity teams.

Poll history — On this board 6 of 6 polls since Jun 29 · now #3

#2#2#2#2#1#3

What changed in the models’ minds

GPTJul 9Jul 10 poll

  • Newmultilayer shadow-API discovery
  • Newtransparent pricingPublish transparent pricing
  • Newsimplify licensing
  • Droppedscheduling and reportingstrong scheduling, discovery, reporting

+2 more changes

Top alternatives per the models: Burp Suite · StackHawk · OWASP ZAP · HCL AppScan

GPT Claude Gemini #5Grok #3

Proof-based DAST engine that safely exploits and confirms vulnerabilities before reporting (near-zero false positives), now augmented with agentic reasoning; excellent SPA/API/authenticated coverage and portfolio scale proven over years for SaaS application estates

Gemini Automated DAST solution featuring proof-based vulnerability confirmation that automatically executes safe exploits to eliminate false positives in findings like SQLi and XSS. Assumes the organization prioritizes minimizing developer triage overhead over low tool licensing costs.

Where Invicti falls short, per the models

  • Gemini High enterprise price point and slower scan execution times relative to lightweight CLI tools, alongside limited capability for custom multi-step business logic validation.
  • Grok Enterprise pricing and orientation make it overkill or cost-prohibitive for smaller SaaS teams wanting pure lightweight continuous automation

Poll history — On this board 2 of 2 polls since Aug 3 · now #3

#12#3

Top alternatives per the models: Burp Suite Enterprise · XBOW · NodeZero · Aikido Attack

#7🛡 Best DAST tools for API-first applications1/4 models · updated 2026-08-10
GPT Claude Gemini Grok #3

Proof-based confirmation delivers near-zero false positives on critical findings across REST/SOAP/GraphQL; scales cleanly for multi-app estates with audit-ready reports; reliable authenticated scanning

Where Invicti falls short, per the models

  • Grok GraphQL and pure business-logic coverage remain secondary to its web-app strengths — overkill or under-optimized for pure API-only shops

Poll history — On this board 1 of 2 polls since Aug 10 · now #3

#3

Top alternatives per the models: StackHawk · Escape · Bright Security · OWASP ZAP

GPT Claude Gemini #5Grok #5

Broad vulnerability coverage backed by a proprietary proof-based scanning mechanism that auto-verifies critical flaws to eliminate manual verification steps.

Grok Proof-based scanning delivers highest accuracy/low noise (validates exploitability), robust API (REST/SOAP) support with CI/CD options, scales for enterprises while serving practitioners needing trustworthy results over volume.

Where Invicti falls short, per the models

  • Gemini Monolithic enterprise architecture that is slow to run and difficult to containerize for fast, microservices-based CI/CD workflows.

Top alternatives per the models: StackHawk · Escape · OWASP ZAP · Bright Security

Head-to-head — how the models call it

Watch Invicti

Boards re-poll weekly and the models change their minds. One short email only when Invicti's standing moves — a rank change, a rival overtaking, or new reasoning from the models. Nothing otherwise.

Embed your ranking badge

Invicti ranks #2 for best dast tool for dynamic app testing by AI-model consensus. Put the badge in your README, docs or site — it updates automatically as the models re-rank.

Invicti — ranked #2 for Best DAST tool for dynamic app testing by AI models on ModelsAgree
Markdown (README)
[![Invicti — ranked #2 for Best DAST tool for dynamic app testing by AI models on ModelsAgree](https://modelsagree.com/badge/invicti.svg)](https://modelsagree.com/best/best-dast-tool-for-dynamic-app-testing?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-invicti)
HTML
<a href="https://modelsagree.com/best/best-dast-tool-for-dynamic-app-testing?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-invicti"><img src="https://modelsagree.com/badge/invicti.svg" alt="Invicti — ranked #2 for Best DAST tool for dynamic app testing by AI models on ModelsAgree" height="28"></a>

Rankings are computed from what the models answer, re-polled on demand · raw reasoning shown verbatim · methodology