ModelsAgree
← All leaderboards

OWASP ZAP

What ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Grok actually say · August 2026 · incumbent

Visit zaproxy.org

The verdict

OWASP ZAP appears in 4 AI-ranked categories — best position #3 for dast tools for api security testing in ci/cd.

Positioning brief — for the OWASP ZAP team

Why the models put OWASP ZAP at #3 for dast tools for api security testing in ci/cd

  • free open-source option Claude · Grok · Gemini · GPTThe free, open-source baseline that remains genuinely competitive
  • strong CI/CD automation Claude · Grok · Gemini · GPTstrong CI/CD automation
  • extensible scripting and configurability Claude · Grok · Gemini · GPTextensive scripting engine and massive community support
  • OpenAPI, GraphQL, and API coverage Claude · Grok · GPTOpenAPI, SOAP, and GraphQL

What the models credit StackHawk (#1) with — and don’t credit OWASP ZAP

  • straightforward authentication GPTstraightforward authentication
  • strong triage and dedup Claudestrong triage/dedup so devs fix rather than drown
  • developer-friendly PR feedback Claude · Grokdeveloper-friendly feedback in PRs

What would move the rank — the models’ fix lines, unified

  • manual auth scripting and tuning GPT · Claude · Geminiauth scripting, tuning false positives, maintaining configs
  • security expertise required GPT · Geminirequires substantially more configuration and security expertise than the commercial leaders
  • ongoing engineering work without support Claudereal ongoing engineering work with no vendor support behind it

Restructured from verbatim model output · nothing invented · every quote machine-verified

GPT #5Claude #2Gemini #4Grok #3

The free, open-source baseline that remains genuinely competitive: the Automation Framework and OpenAPI/GraphQL add-ons plus official Docker images give a scriptable, license-free API scan in any CI system, with a huge community and total configurability; unbeatable value when budget is zero and near-tie with StackHawk if you have engineering time to invest.

Grok Leading free/open-source option with mature Docker/CLI/GitHub Actions support, SARIF output, strong CI/CD automation, solid REST API coverage via scripts/specs — unbeatable accessibility and community extensibility for typical practitioners.

Gemini Fully open-source and free tool with an extensive scripting engine and massive community support, allowing unlimited custom pipeline integrations without license fees.

GPT Best zero-cost option: its maintained Docker API scan supports OpenAPI, SOAP, and GraphQL, configurable pipeline exit thresholds, authentication contexts, extensibility, and complete self-hosting.

Where OWASP ZAP falls short, per the models

  • GPT Achieving reliable authenticated coverage and low-noise build gates requires substantially more configuration and security expertise than the commercial leaders.
  • Claude You own the glue — auth scripting, tuning false positives, maintaining configs, and scaling across many repos is real ongoing engineering work with no vendor support behind it.
  • Gemini Demands substantial manual tuning and scripting effort from security engineers to handle modern API authentication and prevent alert noise.

Top alternatives per the models: StackHawk · Escape · Bright Security · 42Crunch

#4🕷 Best DAST tool for dynamic app testing3/4 models · updated 2026-07-14
GPT Claude #4Gemini #3Grok #2

Free open-source powerhouse with strong community support, solid automation via Docker/CI, AJAX spider for modern apps, and extensibility; delivers high value for typical practitioners needing broad coverage without cost barriers, proven in production environments.

Gemini The leading open-source DAST solution that is completely free, highly customizable, and easy to run in automated CI/CD environments via a powerful API and Docker wrappers.

Claude The best free, open-source DAST; scriptable, automation-framework-first, huge community, runs headless in any CI pipeline at zero license cost, and remains the baseline scanner embedded in countless other products

Where OWASP ZAP falls short, per the models

  • Claude Reduce false positives and improve out-of-the-box authenticated scanning and modern SPA/API crawling so results are trustworthy without expert tuning
  • Gemini Modernizing its desktop user interface and improving out-of-the-box handling of complex single-page applications without manual scripting.
  • Grok Higher manual triage effort due to moderate false positives and weaker out-of-box auth/complex SPA support compared to commercial tools.

Poll history — On this board 5 of 6 polls since Jun 29 · now #2

#4#7#4#5#2

What changed in the models’ minds

GeminiJun 30Jul 8 poll

  • NewPowerful API and Docker wrappersvia a powerful API and Docker wrappers
  • DroppedMassive communitywith a massive community
  • DroppedModern authentication flows

Top alternatives per the models: Burp Suite · Invicti · StackHawk · HCL AppScan

#4🛡 Best DAST tools for API-first applications4/4 models · updated 2026-08-10
GPT #5Claude #5Gemini #4Grok #5

The premier open-source and free DAST tool, offering unmatched flexibility, active community support, and robust OpenAPI/Postman import scripts for headless CI/CD scanning. Near-tie with Nuclei for open-source adoption, but wins on comprehensive stateful scanning capability.

GPT The strongest free general-purpose choice: scriptable, extensible, CI-friendly, and able to import and actively scan OpenAPI, GraphQL, and SOAP definitions; near-tied with 42Crunch, winning on cost and flexibility.

Claude Free and open source with OpenAPI/SOAP/GraphQL import add-ons, an automation framework, and Docker/CI packaging; the strongest zero-cost option and a sensible baseline for teams that cannot buy commercial tooling.

Grok Free/open-source with mature OpenAPI import, active scanning, and Docker/GitHub Actions automation; fully extensible via scripts/addons for custom API auth and payloads; zero licensing friction for any team size

Where OWASP ZAP falls short, per the models

  • GPT Authentication, stateful workflows, noise control, and business-logic testing demand substantial expert tuning, so it is not turnkey.
  • Claude Higher false-positive and tuning burden, weaker API business-logic and auth-context handling, and you carry the maintenance/config yourself — total cost of ownership in engineer time is real.
  • Gemini Requires significant manual tuning, scripting, and security expertise to handle complex API authentication flows and stateful business logic without producing high noise.
  • Grok Higher false-positive noise and config effort than commercial API-native options — not turnkey for complex auth or large GraphQL surfaces without expertise

Poll history — #5 in all 2 polls since Aug 3

#5#5

Top alternatives per the models: StackHawk · Escape · Bright Security · Burp Suite

GPT Claude Gemini #4Grok

Leading open-source DAST platform providing complete automation flexibility, extensive community add-ons, and CI/CD pipeline integration at zero software cost. Assumes the organization prioritizes an open, highly customizable scanner for shift-left web security testing.

Where OWASP ZAP falls short, per the models

  • Gemini Steeper learning curve requiring substantial manual configuration and script tuning to reliably navigate modern OAuth/SPA authentication and complex app states without generating noise.

Top alternatives per the models: Burp Suite Enterprise · XBOW · NodeZero · Aikido Attack

Head-to-head — how the models call it

Watch OWASP ZAP

Boards re-poll weekly and the models change their minds. One short email only when OWASP ZAP's standing moves — a rank change, a rival overtaking, or new reasoning from the models. Nothing otherwise.

Embed your ranking badge

OWASP ZAP ranks #3 for best dast tools for api security testing in ci/cd by AI-model consensus. Put the badge in your README, docs or site — it updates automatically as the models re-rank.

OWASP ZAP — ranked #3 for Best DAST tools for API security testing in CI/CD by AI models on ModelsAgree
Markdown (README)
[![OWASP ZAP — ranked #3 for Best DAST tools for API security testing in CI/CD by AI models on ModelsAgree](https://modelsagree.com/badge/owasp-zap.svg)](https://modelsagree.com/best/best-dast-tools-for-api-security-testing-in-ci-cd?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-owasp-zap)
HTML
<a href="https://modelsagree.com/best/best-dast-tools-for-api-security-testing-in-ci-cd?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=badge-owasp-zap"><img src="https://modelsagree.com/badge/owasp-zap.svg" alt="OWASP ZAP — ranked #3 for Best DAST tools for API security testing in CI/CD by AI models on ModelsAgree" height="28"></a>

Rankings are computed from what the models answer, re-polled on demand · raw reasoning shown verbatim · methodology